Well skippedover, you left out a few factors about being green. What about all of the energy (fuel) used in the manufacturing of new equipment? What about all of the fuel used in shipping, delivery, install, etc? What about all of the effort to dispose of old equipment (recycle, landfill, etc.)? Is it really green to replace old less efficient reliable working units with new efficient sophisticated designed units utilizing the latest technology (assuming there is no return on the investment)? I’m betting a carbon footprint analysis says no.
As far as being familiar with really big boilers, I spent 35 years in power generating plants with some really really big boilers supplying steam to some really big turbines generating 100’s of megawatts. I mean really big boilers. I won’t even mention some of the sophisticated electronic controls and auxiliary equipment it takes to keep these monsters running.
I thought I had heard it all in my lifetime, folks need to stay in style by replacing a older perfectly good running unit with the latest technology? Surely you jest?? You are in sales, right?
You're quite correct. I'm not a 'green' specialist so going to the n'th degree to figure out if I should eat breakfast of fruits nor nuts just isn't in my normal thought process. I do sell, yes but I'm primarily a service tech/business owner. And I'm also sick and tired of people asking for a "pay back" on their HVAC equipment. Of all the items that a person purchases in a year, the number that provide any savings at all is tiny in comparison to the total. From clothes to gasoline, cars, cell phones, big screen T.V.s, soap, toilet paper! I could go on all day and still hit almost nothing the really provides and savings at all, let alone 'pay back'. Upkeep for the home will pay back something (hopefully, though not as much today as 3-years ago) when you sell the home and cash out. Otherwise, why do people purchase? How many people would actually suffer or be unable to exist without a cell phone? Internet connection? Car with leather interior?
My point is, pay back should NOT be the holy grail of purchasing HVAC equipment. Nobody has saved anything when it comes to vehicle emissions. Yet the atmosphere is arguably cleaner as a result of everyone being forced to operate 'cleaner' engines and low or no lead fuels. Who among us would have volunteered to purchase such an advanced automobile engine, given the high level of computer control, etc. when we could have continued with our old high octane engines of the past? I submit nearly no one.
And low price certainly isn't the monument to which all persons worship if the Yugo automobile is any indicator. It was the original throw away automobile that the price conscious should have purchased by the million! But alas, it went entirely away. And what's the payback on the Corolla that someone purchased rather than a Yugo?
You purchase a car for, in most cases, substantially more than the HVAC system you'll put in your home. Yet the car will do very little work for you most days. You'll perhaps drive it to work in the morning, it sits in the lot all day, drive it home at night where it sits. If you've got a long commute, that's maybe 2-hours out of 24. 7-years = 61,320 hours. Of that, based on 2-hours per day of use, your car, for which you paid considerably more, operates a mere 5,110 hours or 8.33% of the time. Had you purchased your HVAC equipment the same day you purchased your car, it would have operated on average (adjusted for seasons) 8 to 10 hours per day, whether you're home or not! That's 20,440 to 25,550 hours or 33.33% to 41.67% of the time AND that HVAC equipment will operate on the order of 15+ years.
It should be a matter of perspective. Which has more value? The granite counter tops, big screen t.v., smart phone? Or a reliable, reasonably efficient HVAC system? I can't make that determination for folks but I owe it to my prospective clients to at least try and raise their awareness.