HVAC-Talk: Heating, Air & Refrigeration Discussion banner

Topping off with R22 alternative....

100K views 52 replies 26 participants last post by  hvac5646  
#1 ·
... I am in a debate with a friend over replacement R22 options.

He insists there is an alternative refrigerant that you can top off an existing R22 system with. I am skeptical: although I have read mfg claims to this affect I never paid attention.

Your experiences would be welcome.
 
#2 ·
From what I've seen and heard, there is none that you can just top off with other than R22.

All the R22 replacements you have to change the filter drier, and anything with a o-ring on it. Plus reclaim all the refrigerant that is in the system.

I have used MO99 on 1 refrigeration (walk-in cooler), 6 RTU AC systems.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#47 ·
Manufacturers said not to top 12 with hot shot. Been doing it for years with no problems. Have not used any of the 22 alts but as soon as the boss buys me a jug I'm gonna try it on my old package unit. They us a different oil but if it ducked it up I can scrap it so its win win.
 
#11 ·
Just read some the specs on alternative replacements for R22...
the alternatives maybe topped off after the old R22 charge has been replaced.

.I do believe this is what my colleague was getting at
Thanks for all the replies.

Never mixed refrigerant in my entire career Dont intend to start.

But since R22 hit the $500 mark it is now time to say
good bye to it and decide on a alternative.
 
#9 ·
All of the "correct" answers have been given already, however, if you are in a large bind (or are just a lazy hack), I doubt anything bad would happen if you mix refrigerants in small amounts, as long as the p-t charts are close for both of them. The system would probably work just fine.

The problem is, I believe this is against the law according to the EPA. Also, it creates an issue when it comes time to turn in the used refrigerant mixture, since the reclaim company will likely have to destroy it and will charge you a lot of money to do so. This means that if you mix the refrigerants, and the next guy unknowingly recovers it and tries to turn it in, he will get a not so nice surprise. Also, it could cause warranty issues if the compressor manufacturer finds out.
 
Save
#28 ·
Spoken like a true hack.:grin2: LOL. Sorry just kidding, couldn't resist. Your right though if the P-t charts are close and you use only a little (since the meniral oil would mix well with replacement).

And one more thing, the next guy who got stuck with the "mixed" frigerant might want to turn you in also. Thank you, thank you very much
 
Save
#10 ·
This has been a misconception since the R-12 phaseout.

To my knowledge, there has never been a refrigerant that you can "drop-in" on top of a phased-out refrigerant.

The ONLY correct way is to recover, evacuate and recharge with new refrigerant.

Once you start mixing your own refrigerants, you are operating outside of manufacturer's guidelines and, if anything really bad happens, you could be on the hook for it legally.

Do it right and walk away confident.
 
#23 ·
My thoughts.

It is time to retire R-22 and the equipment which uses it.

IMO a pro would be doing the customer a favor by upgrading them to 410... there is more value to the customer in a new 410 system with a parts warranty.
 
Save
#24 ·
Originally Posted by mark beiser
Great, now I'm going to have nightmares about getting a call from our reclaimer informing us that they will be charging us for destroying 200# of mixed R-22, instead of cutting us a check for $1200.



Exactly what I was about to post.
 
#29 ·
From the scuttlebutt I hear at the supply house, their sales of MO99 have understandably increased dramatically, however according to the counter guys, there's reportedly a significant percentage of techs who openly admit...or even brag...about topping off with MO99 in R22 systems.
 
Save
#31 ·
NU 22 is a " drop in" it's 40....something. mfg. is helpful. They have lots of "cool" stuff. It is a blend. someone earlier said small amounts may work if p/t close... I sorta agree. I would pull 22. leak test evacuate etc.then use NU 22

my 2 cents:)
 
#43 ·
This isn't about topping off R22, but it does pertain to the side discussion about recovering R22 mixed with another refrigerant.

While I'm no fan of leak sealers, I found that NuCalgon's Easy Seal uses 2 oz of a hyrocarbon as a propellant, so it may result in a failed recovered refrigerant ID test.

BTW...Cliplight's Superseal doesn't use a propellant.

http://johnstonesupply9.com/docs/EASYSEAL NUCALGON.pdf
 
Save
#46 ·
Don't Forget

Will the manufacturer warrantee the compressor with that replacement refrigerant?

Not sure if they care though, they don't even want them back any more. Just give them the Serial # and they get you a new one.
 
#49 ·
Im going to be using dupont iceon mo99 (R438A) for retrofitting systems that have mineral oil. It has the lowest capacity loss of all of them aprox 5 to 10%. I will also be buying United refrigerations own private brand Thermal Zone condensing units, which is basiclly a rheem product. They are offering those units with polyoester oil. So I can then use R407c as my refrigerant. It is the closest to R22 with the least capacity loss.

Also what will be the going rate this season for R22?
We will be charging $70.00 per pound.
 
#50 ·
let me see if I have this right ,the 22 manufacturers probably are selling 22 jugs to dist for maybe 250 the dist sell it to us for about 500 we sell a jug to our customers for about 2000,wow no wonder nobody trusts us.
 
Save
#53 ·
let me see if I have this right ,the 22 manufacturers probably are selling 22 jugs to dist for maybe 250 the dist sell it to us for about 500 we sell a jug to our customers for about 2000,wow no wonder nobody trusts us.
Should'a gone in on a few skids of 22 a couple years back...but some guys were just hoping the phase out would go away and the price would come down.

Now everybody is paying the price.
 
#52 ·
I am looking for a cheaper alternative as well. I just have a problem with paying 4 or 5 hundred bucks for a cylinder of R-22. As far as selling new R-410 units goes. We've been doing that as well, But we've had a fairly large call back rate on those units. Mostly all leaks and when we finally find them they usually wind up being the evap coil. It does seem fairly limited to package units for some reason though. We put a new gas pack in for a lady about this time of year in 2010. It didn't even make it through the first season before we were back out there looking for a leak. Finally found the leak and replaced the evap coil under warranty in the fall of 2011. We had to go back out there a couple of weeks ago and charge it up again. She's probably got over $1000.00 just in labor and gas since we installed it. How are we supposed to sell that to a widow on a fixed income?
 
Save
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.