Uhhhh.... sorry. No it isn't.
This is cheating the test. First of all, the original scenario was based on the premise of a single aircraft overcoming the belt. It can't be done IF this fictional belt can compensate for any application of power. The belt is resisting an internal source of power in the OP. IF the belt can compensate for any new application of power, the aircraft will be stationary and will not lift off. Period.
IF, however, in this fictional scenario... we introduce a source of power and propulsion that *cannot be accounted for by the belt*... then the comparison has no meaning.
You are talking about a *powered* aircraft not considered by the belt lifting an ultralight off a runway that is only considering the wheelspeed of an unpowered ultralight. And even if the speed was considered... no matter. Because the belt itself would not be actively resisting the power of the tow aircraft.
Exchange the rope for engines... and the belt WOULD be resisting it.
Foul ball there, guys.