I've got a couple.
This is how it started in Australia and England. They banned certain ones and then they kept on banning.. and banning till ALL guns were banned!!
The Gun Ban list is out!
Needless to say, I am a little upset by this list. View the Youtube at the
bottom of this page.
Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always
laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon
us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend
your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is
registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in
Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals
do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the
citizens.
Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory
cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush
administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022,
110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to
introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of
opportunity. It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies,
firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people.
They've made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the
entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under
search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states' rights, free
speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The
Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):
Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
M1 Carbine,
Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
AR-15,
Bushmaster XM15,
Armalite M15,
AR-10,
Thompson 1927,
Thompson M1;
AK,
AKM,
AKS,
AK-47,
AK-74,
ARM,
MAK90,
NHM 90,
NHM 91,
SA 85,
SA 93,
VEPR;
Olympic Arms PCR;
AR70,
Calico Liberty ,
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU,
Fabrique National FN/FAL,
FN/LAR, or FNC,
Hi-Point20Carbine,
HK-91,
HK-93,
HK-94,
HK-PSG-1,
Thompson 1927 Commando,
Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
Saiga,
SAR-8,
SAR-4800,
SKS with detachable magazine,
SLG 95,
SLR 95 or 96,
Steyr AU,
Tavor,
Uzi,
Galil and Uzi Sporter,
Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).
Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
Calico M-110,
MAC-10,
MAC-11, or MPA3,
Olympic Arms OA,
TEC-9,
TEC-DC9,
TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
Uzi.
Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
Armscor 30 BG,
SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
Striker 12,
Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see
below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).
A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a
detachable magazine, and has:
(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10
rounds.
A semiautomatic shotgun with:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity
of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.
Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal,
the U.S. Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally
designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design
of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as
determined by the Attorney General."
Note that Obama's pick for this office,
Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you
have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this
determination, the bill says, "there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a
firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement
agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be
determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the
firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event." In plain English this means
that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public. The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't have a sporting purpose just because it
can be used for sporting purpose -- is that devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a rights infringement with no constitutional or
historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep
and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.
Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm
Forward or send to every gun owner you know...
This is how it started in Australia and England. They banned certain ones and then they kept on banning.. and banning till ALL guns were banned!!
The Gun Ban list is out!
Needless to say, I am a little upset by this list. View the Youtube at the
bottom of this page.
Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always
laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon
us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend
your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is
registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in
Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals
do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the
citizens.
Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory
cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush
administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022,
110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to
introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of
opportunity. It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies,
firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people.
They've made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the
entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under
search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states' rights, free
speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The
Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):
Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
M1 Carbine,
Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
AR-15,
Bushmaster XM15,
Armalite M15,
AR-10,
Thompson 1927,
Thompson M1;
AK,
AKM,
AKS,
AK-47,
AK-74,
ARM,
MAK90,
NHM 90,
NHM 91,
SA 85,
SA 93,
VEPR;
Olympic Arms PCR;
AR70,
Calico Liberty ,
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU,
Fabrique National FN/FAL,
FN/LAR, or FNC,
Hi-Point20Carbine,
HK-91,
HK-93,
HK-94,
HK-PSG-1,
Thompson 1927 Commando,
Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
Saiga,
SAR-8,
SAR-4800,
SKS with detachable magazine,
SLG 95,
SLR 95 or 96,
Steyr AU,
Tavor,
Uzi,
Galil and Uzi Sporter,
Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).
Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
Calico M-110,
MAC-10,
MAC-11, or MPA3,
Olympic Arms OA,
TEC-9,
TEC-DC9,
TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
Uzi.
Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
Armscor 30 BG,
SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
Striker 12,
Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see
below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).
A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a
detachable magazine, and has:
(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10
rounds.
A semiautomatic shotgun with:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity
of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.
Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal,
the U.S. Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally
designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design
of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as
determined by the Attorney General."
Note that Obama's pick for this office,
Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you
have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this
determination, the bill says, "there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a
firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement
agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be
determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the
firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event." In plain English this means
that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public. The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't have a sporting purpose just because it
can be used for sporting purpose -- is that devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a rights infringement with no constitutional or
historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep
and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.
Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm
Forward or send to every gun owner you know...
