What do y'all think about this?
They have it.To make it simple, I would say you both need documentation. The fitting should have some sort of listing to legitimate. If there is no documentation the Fire guy wins. Still the fire guy needs a code to not allow a fitting if said fitting has documentation.
ammoniadog;25886501 Anyways said:tin solder for plumbing will melt around 200°C, that's not hot at all. Any fire will be much hotter than that.
Bingo! Winner Winner Chicken Dinner! LolThey have it.
Lines will be brazed.
Can’t even use Stay Brite8!
What manual is that?What about the manual that states “Brazed Joints”
They were right the first time with that grey plastic crap from the 80's that got banned...lolI’m against shark bite fittings for anything other than to get ya out of a bind with a water leak or something in the middle of the night. But that do have to meet certain standards and to go into houses or whatever have a UL listing and have to be somewhat safe. Things in our field are changing rapidly so I’m sure it’s not long and things like that are going to be more popular cuz let’s face it we’re prolly not gonna use copper forever. I’m sure they can make refrigerant lines out of plastic that’s plenty strong but it’s jist not cost effective yet. Could you imagine all the plumbers in a up roar when plastic plumbing lines first got popular and I’m sure they said it’ll never work or won’t last or whatever. Same is going to go for our trade as well it’s jist a matter of time. I hope that time is a long ways off myself. So my opinion on shark bite for refrigerant lines thumbs down for me
https://www.ci.independence.mo.us/userdocs/ComDev/2018 INTL MECH CODE.pdf1107.5.3 Copper tube. Copper tube used for refrigerant piping erected on the premises shall be seamless copper tube of Type ACR (hard or annealed) complying with ASTM B280 or ASTM B819. Annealed temper copper tube shall not be used in sizes larger than a 2-inch (51 mm)nominal size. Mechanical joints other than press-connect joints listed for refrigerant piping shall not be used on annealed temper copper tube in sizes larger than 7/8-inch(22.2 mm) OD size.
So if I read that correctly.The 2018 International Mechanical Code 1104-5-3 states:
https://www.ci.independence.mo.us/userdocs/ComDev/2018 INTL MECH CODE.pdf
Which would exclude these fittings from usage of r32 or carriers new refrigerant, correct, even though the box Bob posted shows approved for R32?The way I read 1107.5.3, mechanical joints (such as flare nuts) for soft copper up to 7/8"OD are allowed. The exception to this being pressed fittings listed for refrigeration. I read this as any size press fitting
listed for refrigerant would be acceptable.
Then 1107.5.4 states all joints for A2,A3,B2 and B3 must be brazed, which I interpret to mean no mechanical joints (neither pressed nor flare) are allowed for those refrigerant classes.
I would agree. In Sporlan's Zoomlok literature shows a long list of refrigerants, but they add an * for the flammables, noting you should contact your local building and mechanical code officials. They also show the IMC in a list of approval agencies and certifications along with UL, ASHRAE. etc.Which would exclude these fittings from usage of r32 or carriers new refrigerant, correct, even though the box Bob posted shows approved for R32?
My state uses 2018, which is what I references.I appreciate the latest answers that have cited specific code references.
Question: could the discrepancy about the fitting being approved for R32 and how that's listed in the IMC be because the approval is more up to date than the edition of the IMC being cited?