I have a 2004 Bryant furnace (345 MAV), so its approx 12 years old. The furnace has the secondary heat exchanger problem that was subject to the class action law suit. My HVAC technician recently tested flue gases and came up with a reading of 237 ppm of CO AF. That seems pretty bad (though my neighbour's furnace tested out at 1200 CO AF – he is replacing his furnace as I type this). My HVAC technician has given me two options.
1) Purchase a new Carrier 2 stage furnace. Manufacturer’s rebate for replacing the defective unit plus a government rebate available in my area will help with the costs a bit.
2) Replace the secondary heat exchanger under the extended warranty offered by Carrier/Bryant. My technician says the manufacturer does not cover his full fee for this job so it will still cost me around 8% to 10% of the cost of the new furnace (based on my rough calculations).
While I would prefer not to spend on a new furnace now, the furnace is coming up on 12 years old and I am concerned about the reliability of the other parts (such as the inducer motor). Technician is of course pushing the new furnace option believing that I will have other problems with my furnace that will need repair in the upcoming years. I don't know if it impacts reliability but I do keep the furnace set to circulate air even when the heat or AC is not on.
Based on the above, anyone have any thoughts on having the exchanger replaced vs buying the new furnace?
1) Purchase a new Carrier 2 stage furnace. Manufacturer’s rebate for replacing the defective unit plus a government rebate available in my area will help with the costs a bit.
2) Replace the secondary heat exchanger under the extended warranty offered by Carrier/Bryant. My technician says the manufacturer does not cover his full fee for this job so it will still cost me around 8% to 10% of the cost of the new furnace (based on my rough calculations).
While I would prefer not to spend on a new furnace now, the furnace is coming up on 12 years old and I am concerned about the reliability of the other parts (such as the inducer motor). Technician is of course pushing the new furnace option believing that I will have other problems with my furnace that will need repair in the upcoming years. I don't know if it impacts reliability but I do keep the furnace set to circulate air even when the heat or AC is not on.
Based on the above, anyone have any thoughts on having the exchanger replaced vs buying the new furnace?