I’m very happy to have found this forum as I’m in the uncomfortable position of needing to make a quick decision on a new oil-fired boiler for my small house. I had a no-heat issue almost two weeks ago, and the tech who came out got my boiler working but said he would be back the next day to shut it down - said he had to “condemn” it as it was unsafe to run. We have to replace it ASAP - I’m in the northeast US and nights are getting a little chilly!
As a homeowner and not HVAC specialist I know very little about the ins & outs of boilers – the different types, and especially what’s involved in replacing one. I’m learning things every day but I must say that some oil companies have given me advice that sometimes contradict what another company says, and as a non-pro it gets confusing.
I don’t want to make this post too long (no luck there, sorry) so I’ll start with a few basic Qs. I have two quotes so far, they are $1000 apart. Quite a spread. Both companies are solid, the more expensive one is the one we’ve dealt with for years though they have not been servicing the boiler recently (we have a propane account with them). The dead boiler is a Slant Fin Liberty rated at 117/131K, probably 25 years old. Basic Q #1: company #2 with the $1000 less expensive quote says that an 87K boiler (Burnham MPO86) will do fine for us. The tech measured our baseboards and did some calculations to arrive at this. Company #1 says you should not go to a lower BTU boiler without doing a “heat load assessment.” A third tech guy I called (who is supposed to come this Friday to give us a third quote) says a HLA should not be necessary for us, the baseboard lengths are enough to know what should work. BTW company #1’s quote says “Peerless WBV-03 Cast iron boiler with Beckett burner W/O COIL.” Just a quick aside: the house is a small ranch, about 1600 sq feet. It was damaged in a fire a few years ago and our homeowner’s insurance paid to completely refurb it - it was brought down to studs & beams then got new walls, insulation, baseboards, windows, and a roof. The utility bills have been much lower since then. The boiler does baseboard heat only (we have a propane hot water heater), and it’s a single zone. Anyway, that's Q #1 - heat load assessment; is it really needed if I go with company #2's quote and get a smaller burner than what I had?
Sorry again for the length but if can be indulged one more Q: company #1 says they replace “everything” from the “ceiling down” and to watch out that company #2 is not doing a “slide-in” install. The company #2 tech did talk to me about where they would cut pipes to get the new boiler in, which led me to believe that they were indeed quoting me for a “slide-in.” However, his quote includes a “circulator, new water feeder, air scoop, expansion tank, back-flow preventor, low water cut-off, new smoke pipe to existing chimney and new oil filter.” This sounds to me more than a “slide-in”, am I correct? I really appreciate any replies that help me understand this stuff better – I’m about to write a big check very soon!
As a homeowner and not HVAC specialist I know very little about the ins & outs of boilers – the different types, and especially what’s involved in replacing one. I’m learning things every day but I must say that some oil companies have given me advice that sometimes contradict what another company says, and as a non-pro it gets confusing.
I don’t want to make this post too long (no luck there, sorry) so I’ll start with a few basic Qs. I have two quotes so far, they are $1000 apart. Quite a spread. Both companies are solid, the more expensive one is the one we’ve dealt with for years though they have not been servicing the boiler recently (we have a propane account with them). The dead boiler is a Slant Fin Liberty rated at 117/131K, probably 25 years old. Basic Q #1: company #2 with the $1000 less expensive quote says that an 87K boiler (Burnham MPO86) will do fine for us. The tech measured our baseboards and did some calculations to arrive at this. Company #1 says you should not go to a lower BTU boiler without doing a “heat load assessment.” A third tech guy I called (who is supposed to come this Friday to give us a third quote) says a HLA should not be necessary for us, the baseboard lengths are enough to know what should work. BTW company #1’s quote says “Peerless WBV-03 Cast iron boiler with Beckett burner W/O COIL.” Just a quick aside: the house is a small ranch, about 1600 sq feet. It was damaged in a fire a few years ago and our homeowner’s insurance paid to completely refurb it - it was brought down to studs & beams then got new walls, insulation, baseboards, windows, and a roof. The utility bills have been much lower since then. The boiler does baseboard heat only (we have a propane hot water heater), and it’s a single zone. Anyway, that's Q #1 - heat load assessment; is it really needed if I go with company #2's quote and get a smaller burner than what I had?
Sorry again for the length but if can be indulged one more Q: company #1 says they replace “everything” from the “ceiling down” and to watch out that company #2 is not doing a “slide-in” install. The company #2 tech did talk to me about where they would cut pipes to get the new boiler in, which led me to believe that they were indeed quoting me for a “slide-in.” However, his quote includes a “circulator, new water feeder, air scoop, expansion tank, back-flow preventor, low water cut-off, new smoke pipe to existing chimney and new oil filter.” This sounds to me more than a “slide-in”, am I correct? I really appreciate any replies that help me understand this stuff better – I’m about to write a big check very soon!