HVAC-Talk: Heating, Air & Refrigeration Discussion banner
1 - 20 of 33 Posts

HVACR2012

· Professional Member
Joined
·
28 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I know there are all different types and brands of manometers out there. I'm looking to buy one just trying to get opinions on the best one for the best price. Thanks
 
Hands down Dwyer for analog, Dwyer 475 or Testo 510 for digital. I have used others like UEI and Fieldpiece, but they do not compare.
 
Save
i have a tiny little testo.....awesome does differential too

u get a big fluke cause u got a small weiner....and all that happens is u damage it in your pouch. the mini testo is perfect
 
Save
I asked this question awhile back and got heavily referred to the Testo 510. So I bought it and I like it for the small and simple to use aspect of it. Then my company ordered me the Dwyer U-tube manometer that does both gas pressure and static pressure (when mounted horizontally) because that is what they all use. I have to say that the Dwyer, although larger and more akward to use, is the way to go because it is driven by gravity as it's variable & gravity is pretty damn consistent. Whereas the Testo 510, which is digital, has been hard to trust because I cannot actually "see" what is happening with pressures. I'm forced to trust the numbers that pop up on the Testo, instead of analyzing the movement of the fluid like in the Dwyer. I also am being trained by guys who have more than 25 yrs. in the field, so to them, seeing is believing. Bottom line: I like practicing with my Testo 510 on my equipment, but out in the field on a professional level, I only trust my Dwyer U-Tube. Just being honest.
 
I asked this question awhile back and got heavily referred to the Testo 510. So I bought it and I like it for the small and simple to use aspect of it. Then my company ordered me the Dwyer U-tube manometer that does both gas pressure and static pressure (when mounted horizontally) because that is what they all use. I have to say that the Dwyer, although larger and more akward to use, is the way to go because it is driven by gravity as it's variable & gravity is pretty damn consistent. Whereas the Testo 510, which is digital, has been hard to trust because I cannot actually "see" what is happening with pressures. I'm forced to trust the numbers that pop up on the Testo, instead of analyzing the movement of the fluid like in the Dwyer. I also am being trained by guys who have more than 25 yrs. in the field, so to them, seeing is believing. Bottom line: I like practicing with my Testo 510 on my equipment, but out in the field on a professional level, I only trust my Dwyer U-Tube. Just being honest.
I think that you are being influenced by the "old timers" that you work with.

Have you ever seen any proof that the 510 is not reading correctly?
 
1 - 20 of 33 Posts
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.