I got multiple quotes for systems and am trying to decide between two Mitsubishi systems. The house is a colonial with a manual J load that matches the outdoor unit.
System 1) Mitsubishi MXZ-SM48NAMHZ (hyper heat 4 ton) with two ducted air handlers SVZ-KP24NA (one up and one downstairs).
- This seems to be what would be considered "standard"
System 2) Mitsubishi MXZ-SM48NAMHZ (same as above) with two ducted air handlers SVZ-KP30NA (same as above)
- Contractor says the air flow with the two tons air handler is too low for the open floor plan 1st floor (SVZ-KP24NA can only do 735CFM @ 2 tons.
From reading online it seems like all the Mitsubishi air handlers have lower CFM/ton then the standard 400CFM/ton. Why is this the case? Is the 400CFM/ton rule I see all over antiquated or not for variable speed heat pumps?
System 1) Mitsubishi MXZ-SM48NAMHZ (hyper heat 4 ton) with two ducted air handlers SVZ-KP24NA (one up and one downstairs).
- This seems to be what would be considered "standard"
System 2) Mitsubishi MXZ-SM48NAMHZ (same as above) with two ducted air handlers SVZ-KP30NA (same as above)
- Contractor says the air flow with the two tons air handler is too low for the open floor plan 1st floor (SVZ-KP24NA can only do 735CFM @ 2 tons.
From reading online it seems like all the Mitsubishi air handlers have lower CFM/ton then the standard 400CFM/ton. Why is this the case? Is the 400CFM/ton rule I see all over antiquated or not for variable speed heat pumps?