I hope this is an appropriate topic, placed in the correct forum. If not, someone will set me straight, no doubt.
Broad strokes . . .
I own an 1800 square foot home on eastern Long Island which has been completely gutted in preparation for adding 500 square feet to the foundation (basement) and two stacked stories 500 square foot each. The new addition foundation is being poured as I type. The end result will be a new home of 2,800 square feet in keeping with the requirements of the local Architectural Review Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Building Department, etc. Only the original basement and the "bones" of just part of the original home will remain. All structural approvals are in place,
but . . .
I have no idea yet which way to go concerning the specification of a new HVAC system and I am looking for general "pro and con" advice from professionals here.
Personal Bias:
I have experience with steam systems, hydronic radiant heat and conventional forced air systems.
I do not like forced air systems. My preference is for baseboard hydronic systems for heat.
Previous HVAC?
There was no central AC system.
The home was steam heated, the central component being a Weil-McClain SGO-9 boiler, originally oil-fired but recently converted to gas firing. The old radiators are gone. The builder tells me that I should abandon the 2006 boiler and 2018 burner unit in favor of a more efficient system where ducting can be shared by the H and the AC.
Though I cannot abide conventional forced hot air, the builder tells me that new hot air systems are 95+ % efficient and with modern moisture injection, this is the way to go. I'm told that this would be the least-cost approach as well.
The architect has recommended a boiler in the basement with heating coils and piping to the attic where an air handler will circulate hot air and AC through common ducts. As there are two rental units on the second story a common system with a damper/diverter can be used in the attic. I'm not concerned about splitting utility costs, so I am OK with shared subsystems.
If you have stayed with me thus far, you are probably committed to providing some advice and so thank you in advance!
I'm leaning toward circulated hot and cool air using common ducts.
Question: Is a hybrid hydronic/boiler system actually better than a simpler furnace system to heat the air?
Why do people go through the expense of purchasing a boiler and running piping into the attic as well, if in the end, one is circulating hot air that could just as easily be heated in a plenum chamber?
I have eliminated a heat pump approach for the two second floor units due to hardware and maintenance expense and because electric costs are relatively high in the area. Natural gas is cheaper and already in the building.
I have not completely eliminated baseboard heat from consideration though higher relative acquisition costs may lead me to do so.
Suggestions are welcome
~ Joe
Broad strokes . . .
I own an 1800 square foot home on eastern Long Island which has been completely gutted in preparation for adding 500 square feet to the foundation (basement) and two stacked stories 500 square foot each. The new addition foundation is being poured as I type. The end result will be a new home of 2,800 square feet in keeping with the requirements of the local Architectural Review Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Building Department, etc. Only the original basement and the "bones" of just part of the original home will remain. All structural approvals are in place,
but . . .
I have no idea yet which way to go concerning the specification of a new HVAC system and I am looking for general "pro and con" advice from professionals here.
Personal Bias:
I have experience with steam systems, hydronic radiant heat and conventional forced air systems.
I do not like forced air systems. My preference is for baseboard hydronic systems for heat.
Previous HVAC?
There was no central AC system.
The home was steam heated, the central component being a Weil-McClain SGO-9 boiler, originally oil-fired but recently converted to gas firing. The old radiators are gone. The builder tells me that I should abandon the 2006 boiler and 2018 burner unit in favor of a more efficient system where ducting can be shared by the H and the AC.
Though I cannot abide conventional forced hot air, the builder tells me that new hot air systems are 95+ % efficient and with modern moisture injection, this is the way to go. I'm told that this would be the least-cost approach as well.
The architect has recommended a boiler in the basement with heating coils and piping to the attic where an air handler will circulate hot air and AC through common ducts. As there are two rental units on the second story a common system with a damper/diverter can be used in the attic. I'm not concerned about splitting utility costs, so I am OK with shared subsystems.
If you have stayed with me thus far, you are probably committed to providing some advice and so thank you in advance!
I'm leaning toward circulated hot and cool air using common ducts.
Question: Is a hybrid hydronic/boiler system actually better than a simpler furnace system to heat the air?
Why do people go through the expense of purchasing a boiler and running piping into the attic as well, if in the end, one is circulating hot air that could just as easily be heated in a plenum chamber?
I have eliminated a heat pump approach for the two second floor units due to hardware and maintenance expense and because electric costs are relatively high in the area. Natural gas is cheaper and already in the building.
I have not completely eliminated baseboard heat from consideration though higher relative acquisition costs may lead me to do so.
Suggestions are welcome
~ Joe