Non-VRF compressors run at 3600 RPM. How much faster than that can VFR compressors be made to run?
Actually, I don't know the typical speed range for VRF. We have always referred to the speed based on the Hz of the AC feed. That is running at 120 Hz is twice the speed of 60 Hz. I believe that they can go up to 7200 RPM but I am not sure. I do know that for a given capacity, the variable speed compressors are physically smaller than the fixed-speed compressor with which they are often paired, so they have to be spinning faster.
That said, colleagues of mine are doing VRF testing right now, and I know they are recording the compressor speed, so I will ask them what range they are seeing. This is a test for one size of one brand, so it wouldn't necessarily tell you the range across which all VRF compressors run.
And are the performance results linear?
If the capacity is 5 tons at 3600 RPM - is it 10 tons at 7200 RPM? And 2.5 tons at 1800 RPM?
PHM
-------------
I am out at the ragged edge of my expertise here, so maybe a compressor engineer will jump in to correct me, but I am fairly certain that what I am going to say is accurate:
If the suction and discharge pressures were the same at all conditions, the performance of the compressor would be pretty close to linear, just like a water pump. However, in a real system, this would not be the case. Typically as speed goes up, discharge pressure goes up and suction pressure goes down. Since gas, unlike water, is compressible the volume moved per revolution will go down as the speed goes up, so it won't be linear.
I will use the idea of a piston in a recip to illustrate. A scroll would follow the same principal.
If you have a water recip pump, each stroke of the piston will sweep the same volume, so if you double the strokes you will double the volume of water moved.
With a compressor, as suction pressure drops, each stroke of the piston moves fewer molecules of refrigerant. The volume of the piston is the same, but with the lower suction pressure there are fewer molecules in the cylinder when the piston is at the bottom of its stroke.
At the top of the stroke, there is always a little bit of gas that cannot get out, just like you can't get the very last bit of toothpaste from the tube. When the discharge pressure is higher, there are more molecules of gas left in that space, so when the piston moves back to the bottom they will take up some of the space that would have gone to new vapor moving into the cylinder.
So, in this case doubling speed would not result in a doubling of the number of molecules moved.