I have to replace an a/c unit for my house, for just the upstairs area (downstairs furnace/ac, upstairs furnace are fine). I've been mulling over the benefits of doing a heat pump vs. a/c, and this is what I've determined:
* Heatpump works till about 30 degrees. So will work in spring/fall in my area (Detroit, MI)
* Carrier/Bryant "HybridHeat" provide electric heating in addition to the standard heat pump functions - this will qualify me for a lower electric rate (non-interruptible) meter for the pump
* I can just replace the a/c with a heatpump and will not have to have major surgery done on the inside units, (except the indoor coil will be replaced for a/c or heatpump)
* Cost saving is likely to be not significant, though the carbon footprint will be lower with heatpump
* Heat pumps do not require increased maintenance compared to a/cs, and have similar lifespans.
Are my assumptions incorrect? Any sage words of advice?
* Heatpump works till about 30 degrees. So will work in spring/fall in my area (Detroit, MI)
* Carrier/Bryant "HybridHeat" provide electric heating in addition to the standard heat pump functions - this will qualify me for a lower electric rate (non-interruptible) meter for the pump
* I can just replace the a/c with a heatpump and will not have to have major surgery done on the inside units, (except the indoor coil will be replaced for a/c or heatpump)
* Cost saving is likely to be not significant, though the carbon footprint will be lower with heatpump
* Heat pumps do not require increased maintenance compared to a/cs, and have similar lifespans.
Are my assumptions incorrect? Any sage words of advice?