R407c was specifically designed to replace R22 and provide 'identical performance' to R22 - same pressures, same equipment. Europe banned R22 long ago and has been using R407c and R134a for more than a decade - comparable performance to R22 and no problems.
R410a has higher enthalpy than R22 and runs at higher pressures, so manufacturers can make equipment smaller per/ton as compared to (R22/R407c) reducing their manufacturing costs - but these higher pressures required R410a equipment to be redesigned, thicker compressor case and smaller displacement scroll, and thicker wall coil tubing - all causing lots of premature failures, leaks...
No surprise, the industry is pushing R410a like it's the 'only alternative to R22'... Ha...
How do you guys feel about R410a vs R407c, which would you install in your home ?
http://www.emersonnetworkpower.com/...te papers/technical note -comparing r407c and r410a as alternatives for r22.pdf
R410a has higher enthalpy than R22 and runs at higher pressures, so manufacturers can make equipment smaller per/ton as compared to (R22/R407c) reducing their manufacturing costs - but these higher pressures required R410a equipment to be redesigned, thicker compressor case and smaller displacement scroll, and thicker wall coil tubing - all causing lots of premature failures, leaks...
No surprise, the industry is pushing R410a like it's the 'only alternative to R22'... Ha...
How do you guys feel about R410a vs R407c, which would you install in your home ?
http://www.emersonnetworkpower.com/...te papers/technical note -comparing r407c and r410a as alternatives for r22.pdf