HVAC-Talk: Heating, Air & Refrigeration Discussion banner
21 - 31 of 31 Posts
Discussion starter · #22 ·
[/COLOR]
Why do you like to do that? (Use night setback, that is.)

I like sleeping in a cool room. Makes my cats (and wife) friendlier.


Why would you prefer that? What do you mean by maximum efficiency?

I would prefer high heat during recovery because I want a rapid warmup from 65 night setting to 71 morning shower setting. I want the house warm fast, I want warm air keeping bath mirrors defogged, and I like hearing that comforting whoosh of the furnace firing up 15 minutes before I get out of bed.

Why would you think that's least efficient?

While gravity made a mistake in calculating first stage efficiency by dividing low stage output by high stage input, my understanding is furnaces are somewhat more efficient at full capacity, though not as much as he had it.

What is your static pressure at low, and high?
Those are the numbers I posted, wanting a interpretation of.

What is your duct leakage at low? At high? A little more at high I guess, but probably not much either way. My ducts are mastic sealed.

What pressure imbalances occur in your rooms at low? At high? I think at high I find further rooms get more heat, so the house is more even. I don't think I have much in the way of pressure imbalances.

How much pressure induced leakage is occurring at low fire? At high?
How much heat gets delivered to occupied space per therm burned on low? How much on high? I think on low, more of the heat lingers in the ducts in my unheated crawlspace, getting wasted there, and more gets to occupied space on high.
And at what temperature is comfort achieved with a low fan rate? How much warmer must the setting be for a rapidly cycling high blowing fan rate? In my particular 1750 sf house, originally with a 3 ton ac and bigger furnace that I replaced with 2 ton a/c and smaller furnace, even at 1,000 cfm on high stage heat, it is not very drafty. That 1000 cfm is divided among 13 baseboard vents each supplied by 6 inch round metal ducts (One duct run for a bath is five inch). I sometimes wonder if I have enough velocity to get good thermal mixing, especially on low.You aren't buying temperature, you are buying comfort. http://bit.ly/comfortcalculator

If you look at this just looking at one tiny slice, it's like your nose is pressed up against a work of art. Would you really do THAT and think you were seeing the whole picture?
Thanks
 
Depending hop dirty the air filer is, your second stage heat static is a bit high. then again, your temp rise is a bit low at that CFM.

If the second stage CFM were dropped to 1,000 CFM even, you would get a better temp rise and lower static.
 
[/COLOR]

Why do you like to do that? (Use night setback, that is.)

I like sleeping in a cool room. Makes my cats (and wife) friendlier.
If the house typically only drops to 68 that must be comfortable, maybe that'd be a better setback.
Why would you prefer that? What do you mean by maximum efficiency?

I would prefer high heat during recovery because I want a rapid warmup from 65 night setting to 71 morning shower setting. I want the house warm fast, I want warm air keeping bath mirrors defogged, and I like hearing that comforting whoosh of the furnace firing up 15 minutes before I get out of bed.
Whoosh? My clients hear NOTHING. Most have to go to the basement and put their hands on the furnace to figure out if it's running. Fast recovery is NOT efficient. It's hitting the pedal to the metal when getting on the highway. Moisture forms on your mirror due to due point temperature. The colder you let your house get, the more visible and invisible surfaces there are that will be at dew point, and the greater your risk of mold, mildew, and rot.
Why would you think that's least efficient?

While gravity made a mistake in calculating first stage efficiency by dividing low stage output by high stage input, my understanding is furnaces are somewhat more efficient at full capacity, though not as much as he had it.
Look at the manufacturers ratings. Then look at fan curve and calculate your ECM draw at .27 and at .78. That might help you understand where you could save energy needlessly wasted.
What is your static pressure at low, and high?
Those are the numbers I posted, wanting a interpretation of.
Too high on high. Good otherwise. I like to see between .1 and .4 - check out Fans law to understand geometric cost of flow at higher pressure.
What is your duct leakage at low? At high? A little more at high I guess, but probably not much either way. My ducts are mastic sealed.
An audit would help you understand where you can reduce waste.
What pressure imbalances occur in your rooms at low? At high? I think at high I find further rooms get more heat, so the house is more even. I don't think I have much in the way of pressure imbalances.
Typically the reverse is true. Hi heat means faster thermostat satisfaction and LESS uniform distribution.
How much pressure induced leakage is occurring at low fire? At high?
How much heat gets delivered to occupied space per therm burned on low? How much on high? I think on low, more of the heat lingers in the ducts in my unheated crawlspace, getting wasted there, and more gets to occupied space on high.

An audit would help you understand where you can reduce waste.



And at what temperature is comfort achieved with a low fan rate? How much warmer must the setting be for a rapidly cycling high blowing fan rate? In my particular 1750 sf house, originally with a 3 ton ac and bigger furnace that I replaced with 2 ton a/c and smaller furnace, even at 1,000 cfm on high stage heat, it is not very drafty. That 1000 cfm is divided among 13 baseboard vents each supplied by 6 inch round metal ducts (One duct run for a bath is five inch). I sometimes wonder if I have enough velocity to get good thermal mixing, especially on low.You aren't buying temperature, you are buying comfort. http://bit.ly/comfortcalculator

If you look at this just looking at one tiny slice, it's like your nose is pressed up against a work of art. Would you really do THAT and think you were seeing the whole picture?


Thanks
You are welcome!
 
Discussion starter · #25 ·
Thanks again, Teddkid, Beenthere, and Gravity. I will take some of all your advice, and the debate has been instructional.

I will see if I can lower cfm, first, just to 1000 from 1033, and then see how it does at 950. Hopefully that gets me near .5 static pressure.

Since it has only run on high fire 250 hours (lifetime service hours, I love the data this stat makes available) over two winters I am probably quibbling anyway. It has run on low fire 517 hours, the rest on heat pump. So it runs on high fire 4% of winter hours, low fire 8% of the time and off or in heat pump mode the rest.

I will think about locking it in high fire. I like the fast option for morning warmup, but I do want it to be capable of low fire on really cold days when I want to maintain temps.

As far as an audit goes, I had a free one from the utility, just a walk-through, no duct leakage or house sealing testing.

But they could not find a lot. I installed house wrap very carefully and sealed around windows when I resided the house a few years ago.

Last year I airsealed my attic and crawl space, and spent several weekends applying goopy mastic to ducts and then wrapping with insulation. I am big into building science. At each step, I could tell a huge difference. For example, after air sealing my attic, my bills went down, but in addition, I did not have to use a humidifier last winter on cold dry windy days as I used to have to do.

I have found that Teddy Bear was right in that keeping humidity under 50%, my son's dust mite allergy went away.

On your homescale, TeddKidd, it was a bit difficult since it is not made for dual fuel, but I converted my gas use to kWh and have a total annual energy use of 16,167 kWh. That put me a touch below "high efficiency home." My annual energy use of 16,167 includes heat, cooling, lights, hot water, everything. My bills over a year for gas and electric combined is $1200, about half of which is heating and cooling, so even if I can find a way in this old 70's house to cut another 20% on heating and cooling, that's only $120 a year. So I am going to skip the duct blaster and air leak testing. If I seal too tight, I won't get any air changes.

The bathroom mirror only fogs up when I am taking a shower, not overnight when the heat is off. So I am not overly concerned with moisture damage to my house--I keep an eye on relative humidity indoors, and have good bath and kitchen vents.

It probably would be cheaper if I kept the house a constant temp 24-7, so the heatpump did all the work, rather than have the night setback, but the difference was about $30 a year. For $30 a year, I am going to enjoy the cool sleeping hours and the wonderful whoosh of that furnace reminding me I got fifteen more minutes. Since the furnace is in a closet across from my bedroom and between my sons' bedrooms, not much chance I will hear nothing. But I like that sound--it is not loud, and it is comforting.
 
I have only anicdotal understanding of what energy use in Charlotte is, that said yours sounds like very low energy use. $120 month?

Also sounds like the furnace operation is practically irrelevant (that static is not though - ecm's last longer if you don't burn them up...)

Your air sealing efforts have probably dramatically reduced mold, mildew, rot risk. Typically those problems occur when large amounts of humid air (driven by stack pressure) come continuously in contact with dew point surfaces. Would be good to get a blower door test. Nice to know the number.

I like/applaud your decision not to obsess about saving a small amount of energy vs satisfying comfort preferences. Late to work once might cost $30.
 
With all due respect to Maikerum, and someone who lives in the Philly suburbs, please don't call temps dropping down to 65 as "winter" :). Although it does sound nice.
 
Discussion starter · #28 ·
Steve, they drop to 65 on the inside. Outside, it will be 20's or 30's. Not too bad, but not Hawaii.

Teddkidd, my gas and electric cost average $100 a month total. According to Duke Energy's user website, my energy use is 58% of typical for my size and age of house in Charlotte's climate. If everyone did what I did, or hired you to weatherize, we would have no energy issues in America. But it is labor and capital intensive, and most people don't think long term, unfortunately.

I would like to lower my high stage furnace CFM to drop the static pressure, but can't figure out how to do it with this Infinity thermostat, yet. As far as I can tell, I can choose between "comfort" and "efficiency" but can't figure out how to otherwise affect fan speed or cfm on high stage.
 
Teddkidd, my gas and electric cost average $100 a month total. According to Duke Energy's user website, my energy use is 58% of typical for my size and age of house in Charlotte's climate. If everyone did what I did, or hired you to weatherize, we would have no energy issues in America. But it is labor and capital intensive, and most people don't think long term, unfortunately.
Well, talk up the $800-$900 a year you are saving. Seems capital intensive NOT to do what you've done.
 
NUTS, nothing more annoying than a link to a huge amount of reading. My apologies!!!!

http://bit.ly/danholohan1992allshookup

Scroll down to the article All Shook Up.

Look for the heading "Low Water Temps" which explains the motivation for Europeans to chase getting more BTU from combustion.

Also look for other great stuff like "
Which only goes to prove that once you think you have it all figured out... you don't.
"

And:
From the beginning, the European heating engineers used wide temperature drops across their systems. Thirty-five to 40f is standard now. Her in the States, we typically work with 20f temperature drops. How come? Habit.
Is this guy GREAT or what!?
 
21 - 31 of 31 Posts
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.